Connect with us

Economy

Ten States Want to Borrow N4.28 Trillion. The Money From Abuja Just Went Up.

Fresh FAAC money landed, yet ten states plan to borrow N4.28 trillion more. It’s a familiar cycle of new cash, bigger debt, and the persistent hope that Abuja’s allocations will never shrink.

Share This

Published

on

Brass balance beam with iron DEBT weight outweighing glass ALLOCATION block
As federal allocations hit N1.15 trillion, ten Nigerian states move forward with a N4.28 trillion borrowing spree for 2026. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

Ten States Want to Borrow N4.28 Trillion. The Money From Abuja Just Went Up.

Published: 13 March, 2026


N4.28 trillion is a number that sits heavy in the air, a sum so large it feels like a character in the story all by itself. Fresh cash landed in the accounts of states from the Federation Account Allocation Committee just in January, a hefty sum shared among federal, state, and local governments. Now, ten of those same states are lining up to borrow that exact staggering amount, as if the new money from Abuja was merely an appetizer for a much larger meal. You read that right, and the appetite for debt appears to be growing faster than the revenue can keep up.


The Infrastructure Story

Governors point at the roads and the collapsed bridges, making the familiar argument that monthly allocations lack the capacity to fix decades of neglect. You need lump sums for that, and debt provides those lump sums with a signature. The trouble is the calculus often skews toward the new and visible, because as BudgIT tracked in 2025, new projects attract voters while maintenance attracts nobody. Borrowing ends up financing monuments rather than the repair of what already exists, and all the while the recurrent expenditure of salaries and overheads continues to consume the bulk of statutory revenue. A persistent structural issue in several states sees personnel costs alone swallowing over 70% of monthly FAAC disbursements, which Premium Times documented in 2025, leaving finance commissioners to see borrowing as the only visible option left after salaries are paid.


The Approval Maze

States have two main routes for this money, the domestic bond market overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Debt Management Office, or the commercial banks, and they need a series of approvals to walk down either path. The state assembly says yes first, then the federal government reviews the plans for sustainability, with the Ministry of Finance supposed to ensure everything aligns with the national debt framework in theory.

“The approval process looks at the numbers, but the real question is whether states have the revenue to service these loans beyond just FAAC. That deeper sometimes gets lost.”
– Dr. Aisha Mohammed, Public Finance Analyst, Arise News, March 2026.

Wait, it gets more complex because interest on existing debt is already deducted at source from the monthly FAAC payments. New borrowing simply increases these automatic deductions, so less cash arrives in state coffers each month, and the spiral quietly tightens its grip.


The IGR Mirage

Contrast this borrowing frenzy with the reality of internal revenue, and you see the fundamental risk laid bare. Take Oyo State, where the proposed borrowing for 2026 is a multiple of its annual Internally Generated Revenue, highlighting a dangerous gap. Debt servicing for many states depends entirely on a consistent stream of federal allocations, not on what they can raise themselves. Oil prices drop, FAAC shrinks, and states with high debt costs and low IGR face immediate distress, a vulnerability that defines the entire high-stakes gamble.


The Sustainability Slippery Slope

The Debt Management Office has a sustainability framework with ratios, but states routinely push against the upper limits, and critics argue the response is often to revise the thresholds upward rather than restrain borrowing. In practice, loans often finance general budget deficits, not just revenue-generating projects, and while the Federal Ministry of Finance can block unsustainable plans, analysts say this authority is used selectively. Political relationships between state governors and the federal centre sometimes get in the way of simple arithmetic, normalizing risk one approval at a time.


Two States, One Problem

Look at Lagos, a state with strong IGR that still depends on FAAC, where a sudden reduction in federal allocation would strain its ambitious debt schedule built on an assumption of continuous growth. Now look north to Kano, a state with a high population but modest IGR, where borrowing plans hinge almost entirely on FAAC consistency, making everything vulnerable to a drought or an oil price crash. The variation between these states is wide, but the common thread is the undeniable, central role of money from Abuja in every calculation.


We Have Seen This Film Before

In 2015, the federal government bailed out states by restructuring expensive loans into bonds, providing relief without fixing the underlying drivers of debt. Many states now planning new borrowing were part of that very deal, so the cycle simply repeats itself: accumulation, distress, and then intervention.

“We restructure debt to give states breathing space, and they interpret that breathing space as a license to borrow again.”
– Lamido Sanusi, This Day, 2025.

Moral hazard, in this story, wears the confident smile of a governor cutting a ribbon.


A Simple Way Forward

One rule could change the entire game, a simple mandate from the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Debt Management Office that a fixed percentage of any new debt service, say 40%, must come from a state’s verified IGR and not from FAAC. The logic is straightforward, forcing states to strengthen their revenue agencies if they want to borrow, aligning debt with genuine local capacity instead of faith in federal allocations that might shrink. The technology exists, the data exists, and the authority certainly exists to implement it. What we seem to lack, time and again, is the collective nerve to just say no.

The money from Abuja just went up, and the borrowing plans went up even faster, setting the stage for another bailout that waits patiently in the wings.

Share This

Economy

Multinational Exodus in Nigeria Deepens with N94 Trillion Loss

N94 trillion and 20,000 jobs have left Nigeria with departing multinationals since 2021. The reasons are a familiar list, but the scale of the loss is a heavy, quiet stone in the economy’s well.

Share This

Published

on

Rusted padlock on a closed industrial metal gate.

Multinational Exodus in Nigeria Deepens with N94 Trillion Loss

Published: 27 March, 2026


N94 trillion is a number that sits there on the page, heavy and silent, like a stone dropped into a deep well. It is the quantified damage from major international companies leaving Nigeria since 2021, a figure from a report by the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria that landed in the first quarter of this year. You can add over 20,000 direct jobs to that total, and the domestic market cannot replace this lost output, not even close, which makes the silence after the stone hits all the more profound.


The thing about the numbers

That N94 trillion is an aggregation of divestments, asset sales, and profits that could not find their way home over five long years. The real trouble begins when you realize new money is not coming in to replace it, as data from the National Bureau of Statistics shows foreign direct investment has declined for four years straight. Look at the names that have gone: Procter & Gamble, GSK, and Sanofi exited manufacturing, while Unilever stopped making home care products, and each closure cited a similar, brutal cluster of problems.


What they are running from

Ask any business operator in Lagos or Port Harcourt for the short list, and they will give it to you without hesitation. A survey pins the primary constraints as foreign exchange volatility, persistent insecurity, and the relentless cost of generating your own power. Even though the Central Bank of Nigeria has unified the exchange rate window, accessing foreign currency remains a daily struggle that frustrates entire corporate treasury departments because you cannot plan when you cannot source dollars for raw materials.

“You cannot run a factory where you cannot source inputs, guarantee staff safety, or predict your energy cost from one week to the next.”
– Segun Ajayi-Kadir, Director-General of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, January 2026.

Insecurity along major transit routes does not just create fear but inflates logistics costs and insurance premiums to absurd levels, making moving goods from Lagos to Abuja as expensive as shipping a container from China, and these are the mundane realities that quietly kill profitability.


A policy of broken records

The government has announced interventions and allocated funds for national security and infrastructure in recent budgets, with all the rhetoric about improving the ease of doing business. Here is the quiet reality check: the total capital expenditure in the 2025 budget was about N11.99 trillion, and the amount lost to corporate exits in five years is nearly eight times that single year’s entire capital budget. Tax incentives exist on paper, but the experience on the ground involves navigating delays at multiple agencies, and a company choosing between Nigeria and Ghana will weigh those operational headaches very heavily indeed.


Who fills the space

The exit does create opportunities for local conglomerates like the Dangote Group and BUA Group to expand into vacated segments, promising greater domestic ownership in the long run. Capacity has its limits, however, because most local manufacturers lack the balance sheet to absorb the massive capital expenditure and technology the departing multinationals possessed, which means the quality and variety of goods available may quietly decline. Job creation from these local firms is slower and more cautious, as they face the same headwinds with less access to global financing, resulting in a net shrinkage of formal sector employment that nobody likes to talk about.

“Local production is growing, but it is a marathon, not a sprint. We cannot replace 50 years of multinational investment in two years.”
– CEO of a major Nigerian food and beverage company, anonymous comment to Vanguard, February 2026.


The view from the street

For workers, it translates to fewer stable, pensionable jobs, with those 20,000 lost positions mostly being formal roles with benefits that have now vanished into the informal sector or precarious gig work. Consumers face higher prices and reduced choice as imported alternatives get more expensive with currency depreciation and locally produced substitutes struggle with consistency. Landlords in industrial areas watch vacancies rise while local vendors lose their largest clients, and the entire economic ecosystem around a major plant deteriorates so fast you can almost hear it crumbling.


Is there a path back

Stopping the exodus would require treating the root causes with a consistency that has been lacking, starting with foreign exchange management that offers transparency and a predictable window to repatriate dividends. Security of life and property is non-negotiable for any serious investment, and the power sector remains a national emergency that makes manufacturing a heroic undertaking every single day. This all comes down to coordination, or the lack of it, across various ministries and the central bank, where businesses receive mixed signals and lose confidence with every passing month.


One tangible step

The government could establish a dedicated Presidential Delivery Unit for the top five investor complaints, a unit that would track and publicly report monthly progress on foreign exchange access, port clearance times, and security on trade corridors. It would need the authority to cut through inter-agency delays with a mandate focused exclusively on removing bottlenecks for existing businesses, where success would be measured simply by a halt in closure announcements. Such a unit would need a leader with direct presidential access and a small, technically competent team publishing simple online dashboards, signaling a shift from talking to doing that everyone could see.


So here we are

The story is one of capital, jobs, and confidence leaving, quantified by that N94 trillion and those 20,000 jobs, with reasons so well-documented they have become a tired refrain. Reversal is possible with focused, sustained action on power, security, and foreign exchange, but the alternative is a continued contraction of the formal industrial base and higher unemployment. The next closure announcement may come tomorrow, and the time for a different response was probably yesterday, which leaves us all waiting to see what today will bring.

Share This
Continue Reading

Economy

The World Happiness Report 2026 Places Nigeria at Position 106

Nigeria sits at 106th on the 2026 World Happiness Report. This number reflects daily pressures—from inflation to security—that shape how people evaluate their lives. It’s more than a rank; it’s a…

Share This

Published

on

Page from World Happiness Report showing numerical ranking for Nigeria
A numerical ranking adjusted by one place. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

The World Happiness Report 2026 Places Nigeria at Position 106

Published: 23 March, 2026


Finland did it again, for the ninth year running, sitting at the very top of the World Happiness Report with Iceland and Denmark following close behind. This is not about them, though, and if you look further down the 2026 list, past Costa Rica breaking into the global top five, you will find Nigeria at position 106. In Africa, we are not in the top five, trailing behind Mauritius (73rd globally), Libya (81st), Algeria (83rd), Tunisia (105th), and South Africa, which brings us to the real question of what a happiness ranking actually measures for the average Nigerian.


More Than a Feeling

The report uses a cold, hard tool called Cantril’s ladder, which asks you to imagine a ladder from zero to ten where the top is your best possible life and the bottom is the worst. Researchers from the Gallup World Poll simply ask which step you are on right now, and your answer becomes your life evaluation score, but there is a catch because that score is then explained by six variables. The model accounts for GDP per capita, social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom to make life choices, generosity, and perceptions of corruption, with the rest being a residual that represents the cultural fabric of a nation. For Nigeria, the 2026 score is a direct reflection of navigating a complex reality where these factors intertwine.


The Naira’s Heavy Footprint

The economic variable carries immense weight in the report, using the log of GDP per capita at purchasing power parity, and the International Monetary Fund forecasts the figure for Nigeria at $9,860 for 2026, which suggests a slow recovery. Now, contrast this with the ground truth where the National Bureau of Statistics reported on March 16, 2026 that headline inflation dropped to 15.06% and food inflation was 12.12%. This is a sharp decline from the terrifying peaks of 2024, but the damage is already done because a salary that covered basics two years ago is now stretched thin, applying direct pressure on the wellbeing the report tries to capture.

“When the price of a ‘painter’ of garri changes every market day, the ladder of life feels shaky.”
– Chika Mbonu, a civil servant in Lagos, speaking in March 2026.


A Strained Safety Net

The social support metric asks if you have someone to count on, and in Nigeria, the answer has always been the extended family, which is an informal network that compensates for a weak formal system. The trouble is that economic pressure is breaking the net because when everyone is struggling, who has the capacity to help, and the scale of need is official. The National Social Safety Nets Coordinating Office manages a National Social Register with over 15 million households as of late 2025, a number from the Federal Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs that reveals the vulnerability our family systems are trying to hold.


Screens and Satisfaction

The 2026 report has a new focus on digital life, and its research found a sweet spot where less than one hour of social media daily links to higher wellbeing than zero use. The global average is now 2.5 hours, a level tied to lower life satisfaction, and it highlights a sharp happiness decline among youth in English-speaking nations, pinned partly on passive scrolling. For Nigerian youth glued to Instagram and TikTok, this is a warning because the comparative effect on our own wellbeing is an emerging, silent variable that creeps into daily life.


Freedom, Giving, and Fair Play

The freedom question is simple, asking if you are satisfied with your freedom to choose what you do with your life, and for many here, the answer is constrained by the job market and by security fears. Generosity, measured by charitable donations, often remains high because it is in our culture, but then there is corruption where the report uses a Gallup World Poll question about whether corruption is widespread in government. Nigeria’s score here has barely budged for years, and this perception eats at trust, corroding the belief in a fair system that should work for everyone.

“The data suggests that where citizens believe their efforts can lead to fair outcomes, life evaluations improve. The opposite is also true.”
– Professor Aisha Mohammed, a policy analyst at the Centre for the Study of the Economies of Africa, in a March 2026 briefing.


Security as a Health Issue

Healthy life expectancy data comes from the World Health Organization, but security concerns in regions across Nigeria cut direct lines to health because instability disrupts farming, fuelling food insecurity and malnutrition. It restricts movement for commerce, education, and healthcare, creating a background anxiety where a trader in the North-East weighing the risk of a market trip has a different calculus of freedom than someone in a stable area. That anxiety filters straight into the life evaluation score, making the ladder feel less stable with every uncertain step.


The Regional Reality

In Sub-Saharan Africa, Nigeria ranks 17th out of 40 countries, placing us in the middle of the pack where the regional average is low, dragged by common struggles with economy and institutions. The global top ten, dominated by Nordic nations, shows what high-functioning institutions and comprehensive welfare achieve, and that is the gap. As the 2026 report notes, Mauritius (73rd) leads Africa, followed by Libya (81st), Algeria (83rd), and Tunisia (105th), and we are behind, looking up at those rungs.


Policy and the Ladder

The report’s authors argue that wellbeing should guide policy as much as GDP, with each variable being a policy lever where boosting GDP per capita needs reforms that create real jobs and strengthening social support means expanding safety nets formally. There is a catch, though, because these issues are tangled together where growth without equity fails and anti-corruption drives without visible convictions fail to shift perception. It is all connected, a delicate balance that requires more than just good intentions.


The Weight of 106

For the average Nigerian, position 106 is not an abstract rank but the ATM queue, the electricity bill, the school fees and the cost of drugs, and the doubt about a fair contract or an honest police officer. These daily realities build the ladder, and the slip from 105 to 106 is minor statistically, but it signals that for many, the step felt less secure over the past three years. Cumulative inflation, insecurity, and eroded trust offset any small gains elsewhere, making the climb feel steeper than before.

“Happiness research tells us that beyond a certain income threshold, the quality of relationships and the fairness of society matter more than extra cash. Our focus must broaden.”
– Dr. Ben Akabueze, Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, at a public lecture in February 2026.


What Comes Next?

The data for the 2026 report covers 2023 to 2025, meaning policies launched in late 2025 or 2026 will only show up later, and the real test is whether they can move the needles Gallup measures. Can they lift real incomes, mend social cohesion, and rebuild public trust, because the answers will write the next happiness chapter of Nigeria. It is a question that hangs in the air, waiting for the work to be done.


A Number to Ponder

106 is just a number that smooths over the vast experiences of 200 million people where some are on the ladder’s top step and many are on the bottom. The report’s value is its consistent method, providing a comparable benchmark where the one-place drop is small but the direction matters more, asking policymakers what will make the average citizen step up one rung next year. The conversation starts by acknowledging the daily pressures behind that number and continues with policies for a good life, not just a growing economy, with the next ranking due in March 2027. The work that counts happens every day between now and then, in the quiet moments of struggle and hope.

Share This
Continue Reading

Economy

UK State Visit: Tinubu Secures $1.5 Billion in Investment Pledges

Tinubu returns from the UK with over $1.5 billion in pledges for ports, farms, and digital projects. The handshakes in London were firm, but the real work of turning promises into steel and jobs…

Share This

Published

on

Construction worker on building site with city skyline in background
A construction worker surveys a developing site following investment announcements UK State Visit. Credit: Photojournalist Archive. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

UK State Visit: Tinubu Secures $1.5 Billion in Investment Pledges

Published: 20 March, 2026


March 2026 was a month for handshakes and photographs in London, the kind that make for splendid official portraits and firm declarations. President Bola Tinubu returned from a four-day UK State Visit with investment commitments exceeding $1.5 billion, hosted by King Charles III and focused on energy, agriculture, and digital infrastructure. A statement from the Presidency of Nigeria laid out the figures that same day, and you could almost hear the collective intake of breath back home.


The Numbers on the Table

The total value of memoranda signed reached $1.52 billion, with British firms like Standard Chartered at the investment roundtable. The British government announced a new development finance package, as the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office noted earlier in the week. This capital matters a great deal when you consider the proposed 2026 budget deficit stands at ₦23.85 trillion, about 4.28% of the projected GDP, making external financing critical for bridging that gap.


Where the Money is Heading

The largest pledge, $990 million, comes from a consortium led by UK Export Finance (UKEF) and targets the refurbishment of the Lagos Port Complex (Apapa) and Tin Can Island Port, which is a central piece of the so-called economic reset. Another $496 million focuses on agriculture through a joint venture to develop a 20,000-hectare integrated dairy project aiming to produce infant formula, while the digital economy attracted $300 million for a satellite to improve rural internet coverage.

“This visit reset the tone of our economic partnership. It moved beyond aid to a focus on mutual investment and job creation.”
– President Bola Tinubu, speaking at a press conference in Abuja on March 19, 2026.

The remaining $32 million is spread across smaller deals with British small and medium-sized enterprises in various sectors, creating a patchwork of potential that stretches from consumer goods to healthcare.


The Context of the Handshake

This visit didn’t happen in a vacuum, of course, because Foreign Direct Investment into Nigeria had fallen to $1.03 billion in the first three quarters of 2025, down from $1.48 billion the year before. The government has pursued aggressive external engagement to reverse this trend, with the UK State Visit following drives in Saudi Arabia, India, and Germany, pushing the total pledged from all these tours past $5 billion. There is always a catch, however, as pledges are merely signatures on paper while the real test is their conversion into concrete projects that disburse funds, and the track record for such conversion in Nigeria has been decidedly mixed over the years.


The Fine Print

Every major commitment carries conditionalities, with the $990 million port deal requiring guarantees on foreign exchange repatriation and the agricultural $496 million deal depending on land acquisition and clearing of title issues—historically complex hurdles that have tripped up many a grand plan. A senior official at the British High Commission in Abuja confirmed due diligence periods of 6 to 9 months, meaning actual fund flows would likely begin in late 2026 or early 2027 if everything proceeds smoothly.

“Our investors are optimistic but pragmatic. They see the demographic potential and the reform direction. Their patience requires visible progress on the ground.”
– British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Richard Montgomery, in an interview with The Cable on March 20, 2026.


For the Average Nigerian

The direct translation of a $1.5 billion pledge into job creation or power supply is not automatic, but if realized, the projects promise thousands of construction and technical positions. The agricultural storage and processing facilities could reduce post-harvest losses, which the Food and Agriculture Organization estimates range from 30-40% for some produce, potentially increasing farmer income and moderating food price inflation in a tangible way for people who need it most.


The Geopolitical Angle

The United Kingdom is repositioning its economic relationship with Africa, and this was the first full state visit hosted by King Charles for an African leader, with symbolism that was quite deliberate. Britain faces competition in Nigeria from China, Turkey, and the Gulf states, where Chinese loans have dominated infrastructure financing for a decade, so the UK strategy appears to pivot towards private sector-led investment in technology and sustainable projects. For Nigeria, diversification of foreign partners is a strategic objective that spreads risk and creates options, which is never a bad position to be in.


Domestic Politics

President Tinubu will present these pledges as validation of his painful economic reforms, arguing that the pain is yielding long-term gain, while the opposition has already questioned the tangible value by citing previous administrations that returned with similar fanfare and pledges that later evaporated. The conversion rate of MoUs to actual projects will be a key metric for political debate, and the visit also served a diplomatic purpose by strengthening bilateral ties that had experienced strain over other issues, mending fences while building financial bridges.


The Road Ahead

President Tinubu’s plane landed in Abuja with signed documents worth $1.5 billion, but the real work begins now in conference rooms and on industrial estates and farmlands across the country. The historical precedent suggests caution, as the gap between investment announcements and financial close in Nigeria has often been wide, though this time the depth of due diligence and the involvement of established institutions offer reasons for measured optimism. So the test is whether the lights come on in a village because of a funded solar farm, which is the only metric that will make this UK State Visit a genuine chapter in the economic story everyone is waiting to read.

Share This
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

error: Content is protected !!