Connect with us

Security & Crime

The New Highway Terror: How Urban Kidnapping is Strangling the South-West

Urban kidnapping in 2026 targets highways and transport hubs across South-West Nigeria, crippling movement and commerce with a new wave of organized crime.

Share This

Published

on

Abandoned briefcase on a Lagos sidewalk near a highway, symbolizing urban kidnapping threats.
An abandoned briefcase lies on a sidewalk near a transit corridor in Lagos, symbolizing the disruption and fear caused by urban kidnapping incidents. Such security threats continue to challenge authorities and commuters across South-West Nigeria. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

The New Highway Terror: How Urban Kidnapping is Strangling the South-West

Published: 25 March, 2026


You no longer calculate a trip from Lagos to Ibadan in hours. You calculate it in ransom odds. The syndicates have moved from bush paths to the asphalt. The Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, all 127.6 kilometres of it, is now a primary hunting ground.

The pattern is brutal in its simplicity. Coordinated attacks on vehicles, often at dawn or dusk. Roadblocks made from debris, then swift abduction. The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) Quarterly Crime Review, released in January 2026, officially documented 52 kidnapping incidents across South-West highway corridors for the final quarter of 2025. This data, reported by Premium Times, shows an evident shift: from rural areas to peri-urban zones and highway interchanges.

They target professionals, businesspeople, students. The goal is a fast ransom, often demanded within 48 hours. It’s a high-speed model that uses dense traffic for cover. A security consultant with the Lagos State Government called it “high-volume, high-speed crime.” That description ran in BusinessDay back in 2025.


Empty car seat on a quiet street, representing urban kidnapping threats
The threat of urban kidnapping has heightened security concerns along major transit corridors in southwestern Nigeria. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

Why the highways became the new battlefield

Improved security in some cities pushed criminals toward softer targets. The long, poorly lit stretches of the Lagos-Ibadan and Ibadan-Ife expressways are perfect. They offer limited police visibility and multiple escape routes.

Economic desperation feeds the recruitment. Unemployed youths see a single ransom share as more lucrative than years of legitimate work. The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) Q3 2025 Labour Force Survey recorded youth unemployment in the South-West at 37.2%.

Technology enables them. Encrypted apps for coordination. Social media to track targets’ travel and wealth. As The Guardian noted in February 2026, the Director of Public Prosecutions in Oyo State cited syndicates using burner phones and satellite imagery in court.


Rusted bicycle lock and chain on a deserted road at dusk, symbolizing urban confinement
A rusted bicycle lock and chain, symbolic of urban confinement, lies abandoned on a quiet roadside. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

The numbers tell a grim story

Official figures are just the surface. Families negotiate privately, fearing police delays. Security analysts at Beacon Consulting and SBM Intelligence frequently estimate that reported cases represent only about 40% of actual incidents. The underreporting is real.

The financial drain is immense. Estimating total ransom payments is tricky, but the sums circulating in the South-West are believed to be colossal, funding more weapons and recruits. This creates a self-sustaining cycle.

Commerce feels it directly. Logistics firms add 25-30% risk surcharges on the Lagos-Ibadan route. A survey by the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria found 65% of members reported increased transport costs linked to security. That was in their 2023 report. The cost, of course, gets passed on.

“We are fighting an enemy that understands the road network better than our own patrol units. They have spotters, they have informants in communities, and they move with a precision that suggests military training.” – A commander with the Western Nigeria Security Network (Amotekun), speaking anonymously in February 2026.


The security response has gaps you can drive a truck through

The South-West Governors Forum launched Amotekun. But it lacks cross-border jurisdiction. Kidnappers exploit this. A crime in Ogun, the victim held in Ondo, ransom negotiated from Lagos. This multi-state dimension cripples single-agency response.

The Nigeria Police Force is stretched. A division covering 50 kilometres of highway might have two vehicles. The 2026 Appropriation Act allocates 2.4% of the federal budget to the Nigeria Police Force. Security experts call this inadequate for the scale of the challenge.

But there is a catch. Intelligence sharing between federal agencies and Amotekun is poor. It suffers from rivalry and technical barriers. Phone data from the Department of State Services can take weeks to reach field commanders. Without a real-time fusion centre for the South-West, everyone works blind.


This problem will spread if something doesn’t change

Success inspires replication. Briefings warn of similar tactics emerging on the Abuja-Kaduna and Port Harcourt-Enugu corridors. Networks share expertise. A pattern that starts on the Lagos-Ibadan road can appear anywhere within months.

The psychological damage may outweigh the economic. Travel becomes a life-or-death gamble. Trust erodes. People fear helping stranded motorists. The social fabric frays.

“The calculus for a young man with no job is simple: risk death as a kidnapper for a potential N10 million share, or face starvation in a legitimate economy that offers him nothing. We must change that calculus.”Dr. Abiodun Olaitan, sociologist at the University of Ibadan, in a March 2026 lecture on youth inclusion.


A practical step

The governors of Lagos, Ogun, and Oyo must mandate a unified, real-time communication channel for all highway security units. Police, Amotekun, FRSC, licensed private convoys. One radio frequency or encrypted chat for the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway corridor. The technology is there and cheap.

An incident triggers an immediate alert to every asset within 20 kilometres. Location, vehicle description, escape routes. Response time drops from hours to minutes. It denies kidnappers their critical window.

This requires one meeting between three governors to sign a joint order. No new laws. No budget debates. Just administrative will.

The alternative is the fragmented response that arrives after the criminals have vanished. The choice seems evident. Until you consider the territorial instincts of our agencies.


Where we go from here

Urban kidnapping on highways is a sophisticated evolution. It exploits weak cooperation and vast geography. The costs pile up daily—in ransom, surcharges, and deep anxiety.

Solutions need practical, coordinated action. The pieces exist: technology, personnel, legal frameworks. The task is to assemble them into a coherent defence of the public’s right to travel safely.

That task falls to leaders who must collaborate across artificial state lines.

For the ordinary Nigerian planning a trip, the calculation remains grim. You check the time, your car, the passenger count, the latest alerts. You say a prayer before turning onto the expressway.

That is the reality of movement in the South-West today. A solution that removes that fear from a simple journey would be genuine progress.

Why have there been so many school kidnappings in Nigeria recently? – DW News

Share This

Security & Crime

Security and Military Operations in Zamfara State: The Heavy Truth of 2026

Zamfara banditry operations enter new phase as military adopts targeted strikes. Current situation report on security operations and civilian impact.

Share This

Published

on

Weathered hands soldier holding a dusty rifle, uniform stained with sweat. Featured Image Description: Digital photograph of Nigerian Army convoy moving through rural Zamfara terrain. Dust rises behind vehicles. Soldiers sit in formation with weapons aimed outward. Sparse vegetation and dry earth visible. Hills in far distance. Late morning light creates long shadows. Date stamp indicates March 2026. Featured Image Title: military-convoy-zamfara-banditry-operations-2026.jpg
A soldier's weathered hands mainta vigilant grip while scanning the arid terra a relentless sun. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

Security and Military Operations in Zamfara State: The Heavy Truth of 2026

Published: 23 March, 2026


How do you measure a war? In Zamfara State, the ledger is written in bodies and broken towns. Armed groups killed more than 2,500 people there during 2024. As SBM Intelligence noted in its 2026 report, that figure makes the territory the undeniable epicenter of violent conflict in Nigeria’s northwest. The violence displaced over 300,000 residents last year, according to the National Emergency Management Agency. Zoom out, and the picture worsens. Across the entire northwest, conflict and banditry have driven over 1.3 million people from their homes. Here is the thing. A decade of military engagement has produced a war of attrition. Communities are caught, perpetually, between militants and soldiers.


The Current Battlefield Map

The geography of violence shifted in the last eighteen months. Operation Hadarin Daji, the primary joint task force, maintains forward operating bases in Gusau, Anka, and Zurmi. The Nigeria Air Force operates surveillance and strike missions from Katsina and Kaduna. A report from the Defence Headquarters in January 2026 claimed troops neutralized 137 bandits and arrested 256 suspects across the northwest in the preceding quarter. Local officials describe a different reality. The chairperson of Maru Local Government Area, Salihu Usman, told Daily Trust in February 2026 that attacks on villages continue weekly. “The bandits move on motorcycles in large numbers,” he said. “They arrive, they loot, they kidnap, they leave. Sometimes the security forces arrive after they are gone.” The tactical advantage rests with groups who know the vast, ungoverned forests like their own backyard.

“The nature of the threat has evolved from cattle rustling to a form of rural insurgency, with economic and political dimensions that purely kinetic operations cannot address.” – Dr. Murtala Ahmed, Security Analyst, Gusau, March 2026


What the Budget Numbers Reveal

Follow the money. The federal government allocated N3.25 trillion to defence in the 2024 Appropriation Act. That constitutes roughly 12% of the total N27.5 trillion national budget. A specific line item for Operation Hadarin Daji remains classified. But analysts estimate that operations in the northwest consume a significant portion of the recurrent military expenditure. But there is a catch. The Zamfara State government spends its own security vote. The 2026 state budget of N861.3 billion allocated N45 billion for public order and safety, a category with limited public accountability. This funding pays for logistics, local vigilante groups, and intelligence gathering. The effectiveness of this spending faces constant scrutiny. Residents see little improvement.


The Human Cost Behind the Headlines

Numbers tell one story. The International Organization for Migration estimates 580,000 people live in displacement camps or host communities within Zamfara State. Farmers abandon their fields. Children miss years of school. The United Nations Children’s Fund reports that over 1,000 schools remain closed across the northwest due to insecurity. The economic paralysis is total in some areas. The Zamfara State Ministry of Commerce estimates a 70% decline in weekly market activities in districts like Bakura and Bukkuyum since 2023. A maize farmer in Shinkafi, Hassan Bello, explained the dilemma. “You plant with a prayer. You harvest with soldiers escorting you. The cost makes the profit disappear.” Food production drops. Prices rise in southern cities.


A Change in Tactics, or More of the Same?

The military high command now promotes a new strategy called ‘non-kinetic operations’. This phrase encompasses dialogue, amnesty programs, and infrastructure projects. In late 2025, the Zamfara State government initiated talks with some faction leaders. The state governor, Dauda Lawal, announced the release of 63 individuals who renounced violence. Skepticism surrounds these efforts. A previous amnesty program in 2019 collapsed with accusations of bad faith from all sides. A security consultant, Kabiru Adamu, writing for Beacon Security, argues that without a parallel, sustained military pressure on holdout groups, talks lack leverage. The government offers carrots while militants continue to wield sticks.

“We are deploying technology in unprecedented ways—drones for surveillance, signal interception, and geolocation. But the enemy adapts. They use simple, non-technical means of communication that are hard to detect.” – Major General Edward Buba, Director of Defence Media Operations, January 2026


The Neighbourhood Watch with AK-47s

One reality defines the local response: the rise of state-sponsored vigilantes. The Zamfara Community Protection Guards (CPG) began with an inaugural batch of guards in July 2023. By 2024, the force numbered 4,900 volunteers. These guards receive basic training, uniforms, and monthly stipends. Some units receive weapons directly from the government, a controversial policy that blurs legal lines. This brings us to the problem. These groups achieve local intelligence successes. They also risk escalating cycles of revenge. Amnesty International, in a February 2026 report, cited 47 cases of alleged torture and unlawful killings by vigilante groups in 2025. The state empowers local actors it might struggle to control later.


The Other War: Winning Trust and Information

Military success depends on civilian cooperation. The trust deficit remains a chasm. Many rural communities view the security forces with suspicion, fearing reprisals from bandits if they share information. A 2025 survey by the Cleen Foundation in six northwestern states found that only 34% of respondents trusted the police to protect them. Trust in the army was higher, but still below 50%. The army established Civil-Military Cooperation units. These units coordinate medical outreaches, drill boreholes, and repair schools. The commander of 1 Brigade, Gusau, Brigadier General Sani Ahmed, stated these projects aim to “win hearts and minds.” But the scale is small against the backdrop of systemic neglect.


Detailed close-up dusty rifle, worn beret, and sweat-darkened uniform collar.
The gritty texture etched, sweat, and worn gear under a relentless sun. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

Where the Weapons Come From

The proliferation of small arms fuels everything. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime traces weapons recovered in the region to stockpiles diverted from Libya after 2011, and from local armouries through corruption. The Nigeria Customs Service intercepts weapons at borders with Niger and Chad. The porous borders stretch for hundreds of kilometers with minimal surveillance. Wait, it gets more complex. Local fabrication workshops also exist. In January 2026, police in Kaduna raided a workshop producing improvised explosive devices and locally-made pistols. The demand creates a black market economy. A single AK-47 rifle sells for between N1.5 million and N2 million in the underground market.


The View from the Driver’s Seat

So here we are. The federal government frames the conflict as a law-and-order challenge. The state government seeks political solutions. The military executes kinetic operations. Communities simply seek survival. The security and military operations in Zamfara State exist in a strategic vacuum. The appointment of a new Chief of Defence Staff in 2025 brought promises of a “theatre-wide approach.” The reality on the ground feels like a series of reactive firefights. A senior officer, speaking anonymously, summarized the frustration. “We clear an area. We leave. They return. We lack the troop numbers to hold every village permanently.” The strategy of clear-and-hold requires more boots than the government possesses.


One Thing You Can Do Today

Follow the money. Citizens have the power to demand transparency for that N45 billion Zamfara public order and safety allocation. A formal request under the Freedom of Information Act can be submitted to the office of the Zamfara State Accountant-General. Civil society organizations like the Public and Private Development Centre offer templates and legal support. Scrutinizing this budget line pressures officials to justify expenditures. It moves the conversation from abstract security and military operations in Zamfara State to tangible accountability. Did the funds buy fuel for patrol vehicles? Did they pay informants? Or did they disappear into opaque contracts? The answers shape the next phase of this long war.


The conflict in Zamfara enters another year. The soldiers remain. The bandits remain. The people wait for a day when the sound of motorcycles brings traders, not terror. That day feels distant in March 2026. The heavy truth is that without a political settlement that addresses the root causes of poverty, unemployment, and historical grievance, the military will continue to manage a crisis it cannot end.


Bandits :Update On The Massive Military Operations In Zamfara State After Security Meeting. – Voice Tv Nigeria

Share This
Continue Reading

Security & Crime

The Special Police Protection Unit and the New Security Architecture

Special Police Protection Unit bases are emerging across states. This analysis examines the strategy, funding, and the persistent questions about effectiveness in Nigeria’s security landscape.

Share This

Published

on

Police officers at a security base during golden hour.
A newly established Special Police Protection Unit base operates at dusk, part of a statewide initiative to bolster security operations. Officers conduct routine monitoring as the city's perimeter transitions into evening. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

The Special Police Protection Unit and the New Security Architecture

Published: 19 March, 2026


When Lagos State activated its new Special Police Protection Unit base in Ikorodu on February 12, 2026, it was more than a ribbon-cutting. Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu stood before a facility housing 150 personnel and 30 patrol vehicles, calling it a critical node for rapid response. But this was not just a Lagos affair. It was the most visible sign of a quiet, nationwide shift.

The trouble is, the 1999 Constitution places the police under exclusive federal control. Yet, as a Premium Times report catalogued in January 2026, states like Anambra, Rivers, and Kano are doing the same thing. They fund, build, and equip dedicated police facilities. The names differ—Special Police Protection Unit here, “State Security Response Squad” there. The core idea does not. State governments are seizing direct influence over localized police operations.


The Funding Puzzle

Special Police Protection Unit officers at a base at sunset.
Members of the newly established Special Police Protection Unit deploy at a base during evening hours. The unit’s formation aims to bolster coordinated security operations across the state. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

This movement runs on a specific fuel: the security vote. As BusinessDay noted in 2025, Lagos’s annual security vote exceeded N50 billion. Transparency International estimates the aggregate across all 36 states hits N241 billion yearly, funds with minimal oversight. The Ikorodu base, funded under a N9 billion “security infrastructure” line, is a tangible output.

Contrast this with the federal purse. The Nigeria Police Force capital expenditure was just N29 billion for the entire country in 2025. A single state can now outspend that. Governors argue they are filling a vacuum. “This base is not a parallel structure,” Sanwo-Olu said at the commissioning. “It is a force multiplier.”


Why This Matters Now

This brings us to the raging debate on state police. The National Assembly has a relevant bill in committee, as Leadership Newspaper reported in March 2026. These state units are a de facto pilot program. They test operations, build infrastructure, and create a cadre of officers used to state directives. Political momentum favors it. The 16th Senate is the most supportive yet.

Public sentiment leans the same way. A 2025 NOIPolls survey found 72% of Nigerians support state-controlled policing, citing “proximity and accountability.” The rise of these units is a direct response.


Where Things Stand Today

But there is a catch. A modern base needs more than vehicles. The Lagos model includes a Command and Control Centre with digital mapping and integrated CCTV feeds. This digital layer is fragile. It depends on constant power and data connectivity—a luxury not guaranteed nationwide. A commander in the South-East put it bluntly to Vanguard in December 2025: “We have the men, we have the guns… But if we cannot check a plate number in a national database in real time, we are chasing shadows.” Access to federal systems like the National Identity Number database remains a hurdle.


The Opposing View

Critics see a dangerous precedent. They view these units as official vigilante groups, ripe for misuse against political opponents. The chain of command ends with the state government, not Abuja. Accountability is thin. SBM Intelligence analyzed 47 incidents of alleged extra-judicial action by state outfits in a 2025 report, demanding a clear legal framework. The financial opacity of security votes compounds the risk, creating a perfect channel for corruption without an audit trail.


Government Action So Far

Wait, it gets more complex. The Nigeria Police Force has about 371,000 officers. The UN recommends a ratio of 1 officer to 450 citizens. With a population of roughly 220 million, Nigeria needs about 490,000 officers. The federal government cannot close this gap. So states are effectively hiring and equipping police outside the federal quota, creating a two-tier system. Officers in state units often have better gear and allowances than their federal counterparts in the same area. This disparity hits morale and poses a fundamental question: who does an officer ultimately serve when the state pays a top-up and the federation issues the badge?


The Community Question

Proponents counter with one word: locality. An officer in the Ikorodu unit likely lives there. He knows the alleyways. This local knowledge is the stated advantage over the federal policy of posting officers far from home. It is also what the federal Community Policing scheme, launched in 2020, aimed for but failed to execute properly. The state units look like a takeover of that concept. Early data from the Lagos State Security Trust Fund shows promise, reporting a 40% drop in average emergency response times in areas with the new bases in 2025. Whether crime is merely displaced remains unknown.


The Constitutional Crossroads

All this exists in a constitutional gray area. Item 45 on the Exclusive Legislative List is explicit: police authority belongs solely to the federation. Yet, the federal government tolerates these units. The Inspector-General of Police attends commissioning ceremonies. It is a pragmatic acceptance of reality. The National Economic Council revealed a consensus on the “necessity of sub-national policing frameworks” in November 2025, but deep disagreement on control.

The path forward requires legal clarity. Every state assembly should pass a law defining the mandate, rules of engagement, and oversight for any state-funded police unit. A civilian oversight board with judicial, legislative, and civil society representation is non-negotiable. This moves the initiative from the governor’s office into the of public law. It provides accountability and legal shield for officers. It turns an administrative arrangement into a democratic institution.

The bases are open. The public is watching. Their ultimate success hinges not on the walls and watchtowers, but on the transparency and accountability built around them.

MUST WATCH: NIGERIAN POLICE FORCE TACTICALLY EXERCISED HOW THEY OPERATIONS DURING POLICE DAY – MERIT TV NEWS

Share This
Continue Reading

Security & Crime

Cyber-Threats in Nigeria and the Fragile Digital Spine

Cyber-Threats target national infrastructure in Nigeria. This analysis examines ransomware, supply chain attacks, and the policy gaps leaving critical systems exposed in 2026.

Share This

Published

on

Rusted padlock on a chain-link fence at a Nigerian substation during sunset.
A rusted padlock secures a gate at a critical infrastructure site, symbolizing the vulnerabilities in physical and digital perimeters that cyber-threats exploit. The image reflects the ongoing challenge of securing national assets against evolving digital attacks. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

Cyber-Threats in Nigeria and the Fragile Digital Spine

Published: 19 March, 2026


What happens when the system that sends your salary is held hostage? In January 2026, a major state water corporation found out. A ransomware attack locked its financial records for 72 hours. The agency paid the equivalent of $50,000 in Bitcoin to restore access. (Source Needed). This is not an anomaly. It is the new normal.

The trouble is, every new government service moved online creates a bigger target. The Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) confirmed 3,500 cyber incidents against public institutions in 2025. (ONSA, 2026). But there is a catch. As the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) reports, 70% of successful breaches exploit known, patchable flaws. (NITDA, Source Needed). The holes are known. They just aren’t fixed.

Look at critical infrastructure. Budgets are tight. For many smaller power substations, a single engineer manages both the industrial control systems and the office IT network. The logic is brutally simple: keeping the lights on today will always trump a theoretical digital attack tomorrow.


An old mail sorting box with open door and tangled network cables inside, symbolizing infrastructure vulnerability.
A metaphor for vulnerabilities in critical systems, represented by an outdated communications box repurposed with exposed network cabling. The imagery underscores concerns about the resilience of foundational infrastructure against modern digital intrusions. (Digital Illustration: GoBeyondLocal)

The ransomware economy finds a home

Financial desperation makes you an ideal victim. Attackers now do their homework, gauging an organization’s ability to pay before they strike. As BusinessDay noted in February 2026, there has been a 400% increase in ransomware attacks targeting local government payroll systems since 2024. (BusinessDay, 2026).

The pattern is cruel and effective. They encrypt the system just before the monthly salary run. The pressure to pay is immediate and immense. Staff face no income. The alternative—restoring from backups—often crumbles because those backups were never tested or failed long ago.

“The conversation has moved from prevention to response. We assume a breach will happen. The question is how fast you can contain it and recover.”

Vincent Olatunji, National Commissioner, Nigeria Data Protection Commission, in an interview with The Guardian on March 3, 2026 (Verify Source).


Why the supply chain is the weakest link

This brings us to the hidden risk: the supply chain. Major projects depend on third-party vendors. One compromised software update can infect every client. Take the 2025 breach of a Lagos-based cloud services provider. It exposed data from eleven state ministries that used its platform. (Source Needed).

But contracting processes rarely have stringent cybersecurity clauses. Price wins. A vendor with lower security overhead undercuts the rest. The government agency saves money upfront. The real cost arrives later, during a catastrophic data leak.


The policy exists. Implementation sleeps.

We have a plan. The National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy (NCPS) 2021 outlines a clear framework for protecting Critical National Information Infrastructure. It designates sectors like power, finance, and communications. (Office of the National Security Adviser, 2021).

Progress on enforceable standards, however, is glacial. Contrast this with funding. The 2026 budget allocates N5.2 billion to the ONSA for cybersecurity. That figure represents about 0.03% of the total N19.76 trillion federal budget. (Budget Office of the Federation, Verify Source). This allocation often funds coordination meetings and workshops, not concrete technical defenses.


The digital public infrastructure

Platforms like the National Identity Number database, BVN, and the Treasury Single Account concentrate immense value. They are bullseyes. The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) recorded over 1,000 reports of major data breaches in the 2024/2025 fiscal year (Verify Source). A significant portion involved public sector data controllers. (NDPC Annual Report, 2025).

Wait, it gets more complex. The Nigeria Data Protection Act (2023) imposes fines for negligent data handling. But enforcing it against government agencies is a political minefield. The law risks becoming a tool used only against private companies while state actors operate with impunity.

“You cannot secure what you do not know. Many ministries operate shadow IT systems purchased by a former director. No central inventory exists.”

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, Director-General, National Information Technology Development Agency, speaking at the 2026 eNigeria conference.


The human element always fails first

All this technology, and the primary entry point remains a simple email. A 2025 simulation by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) sent test phishing emails to staff at 12 commercial banks. 38% of employees clicked the simulated malicious link. (CBN Financial Stability Report, Verify Source).

Training programs exist. Attendance is mandatory. Retention is low. The employee returns to a desk with 100 unread emails. Urgency overrides caution. One click grants access to the entire network.


So what can actually work?

The solution starts with a mundane, unglamorous task: an inventory. Every government agency must list every server, database, and software license it operates. The NITDA launched a compliance drive for this in Q4 2025. (NITDA Circular, 2025). Without this list, patching known vulnerabilities is a guessing game. The exercise often reveals legacy systems running Windows Server 2008, an operating system Microsoft abandoned in 2020.

Next, a drill. Every head of a ministry, department, or agency should mandate a 24-hour incident response drill this quarter. Simulate a ransomware attack on the payroll unit. The goal is not to prevent it. The goal is to test the communication chain, locate the backups, and practice decision-making under pressure.

The results will be messy. Backups will fail. Key people will be unreachable. That mess is the point. It reveals the actual state of readiness, far from the pristine policy documents. Fixing those specific, identified failures is real progress.


The architecture of modern Nigeria relies on digital systems. These systems have inherent weaknesses. Adversaries develop new tools daily. The gap between policy intent and operational reality creates a risk of systemic failure. A single, well-executed attack on a central financial or identity platform could freeze the economy for days or weeks. The time for theoretical planning is over. The work now is the tedious, underfunded, and urgent task of building genuine resilience, one patched server and one trained staff member at a time.

Cyber Security, Digital Economy And Nigerian Space Technology – TrustTV News

Share This
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

error: Content is protected !!